Showing posts with label Reviews. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Reviews. Show all posts

Monday, January 17, 2022

Hello Again and The Best of British Baking cookbook review


I took the above photo on a drive this morning, the sun was lighting up Mt. Jefferson to the right of the old barn. 

 Hello all--happy new year! I hope it is going well for everyone. We have already been "snowed in" and had a big thaw with squishy mud! It was hazardous to get out. Excavation for landscaping is underway, but I have to catch all my house-building posts up to this point so more on that much later. I wouldn't mind more snow, it is just the aftermath of sinking 3" into the mud everywhere we walk that is not so fun! A week of sunshine is drying us out nicely.

I wanted to start the year's blogging with a cookbook review, as it was a good time to stay indoors and bake!

I was thrilled to be picked to receive a free copy of this book, The Best of British Baking: Classic Sweet Treats and Savory Bakes to review! I knew that in order to truly review it I would get to bake a lot of treats!

I have followed Marie's blog, The English Kitchen, for a few years and enjoyed her practical, use-what-you-have comfort-food style recipes from both Canadian and British cuisines. Anything from a Canadian cook is going to be successful... and a cookbook of British favorites was a good fit for this tea-lover!
 
Besides the appeal of the recipes, the book itself is beautiful to look at and I like reading all the extras about the cuisines of each region. There are plenty of tips, too.

I have tried four recipes so far: Crumpets, English Muffins, Cornish Pasties and Scottish Shortbread. I confess I've made the shortbread twice and I think it will be the one I make the most from this book! It's really good shortbread!

Here are a few tips of my own for what I have done so far: 
 
--If you are going to treat yourself and order the book, put Crumpet Rings/baking rings in your cart, too! Don't mix up the batter before you discover that you need rings (in other words, read the note at the top of the recipe first!). Improvising may not be for this application. I had to make mine "free form" and the flavor was delicious but you really need the rings.

--The pasty pastry worked! Pastry and I do not get along normally. My pies are usually ragged and patched. This pastry rolled and had no holes! I wondered how the Cornish Pasty filling was going to work out without gravy etc. but it made its own sauce and was such a satisfying, hearty recipe for my family. 

--English muffins take patience (for me at least!). If you have the heat too high, even for a bit, they will get too brown too fast but not done right in the middle. Low and slow is the advice in the book so I need to do this one again.
 


But the shortbread...ahh...the shortbread. It was delicious very warm from the oven. With heroic effort I put aside some for the next day. 
 
Of course I had to take a taste for breakfast, because shortbread is never sitting there on the counter at breakfast time and I the water was boiling for tea... well  someone needed to test these out to see if they were any good the next day. They were! The texture and flavor were just the same. Delicious hot or cold.
 

 I will say that if you have never made Scottish shortbread before, just be aware that it isn't going to form into a dough; it is a mixture like damp sand and when Marie says "tip it into a tin" it's because it's going to dump a mixture of what you will think is too dry to make cookies. It magically melds together in the oven, all sweet buttery-ness and comes out perfectly. I may have to keep making this one regularly to further review it... you know, to double or triple check to make sure it is still delicious.
 
There are savory and sweet baking recipes so I need to decide which kind I am going to bake next...maybe a cake for Valentine's day!
 
 I hope you will take a look at the book, you can see several sample pages on Amazon. Don't forget the crumpet rings (you know you will want to try crumpets out!). Thank you to Marie and her publisher for sharing a copy with me!



Friday, March 12, 2010

The Dame of Sark


Dame of Sark by Sibyl Hathaway

A Book Review
Coming home from an errand a few days ago, I found the family engrossed in an old Victoria magazine article about the Isle of Sark. They were looking at the beautiful gardens of the Seigneurie (the home of the ruler of Sark, the Seigneur) and had fetched the atlas to try and find the small island.

Asked if I could find out more information, I looked it up on the Internet, and soon found myself caught up in a fascinating story about this little Island in the English Channel.

The curious facts of the Island were interesting and amusing: The Isle of Sark was the last feudal state in the world as of two years ago; no cars are allowed on the Isle but they do drive tractors; only the Seigneur was allowed to keep pigeons; until recently they had a strict divorce law (none allowed); the tradition of Clameur de Haro, where a few sentences said in French alert the community that you have had your rights trampled upon, and which insures swift justice; and the brief story of the French physicist who tried to take the whole island over singlehandedly, but was arrested while loading his gun.

Any female hereditary ruler (Seigneur) of the Isle of Sark was called the "Dame of Sark," and after digging a little deeper into this fact, I found myself glued to a memoir written by a Dame of Sark in 1961 about her life on the Island.

The first chapter or two gave the history of the Isle of Sark, from the Normans, to pirates and privateers, to the charter granted by Queen Elizabeth I to allow people to inhabit the Island to protect from said pirates, through the various owners and finally to the Dame's clergyman grandfather, who became the Seigneur and set about with much enthusiasm to improve the poor and neglected island.

Mrs. Hathaway is a good writer, and writes her and the Island's history in an engaging and sometimes amusing way. The story carried me along at a good clip.

Soon, though, I was riveted and could not "put the book down," or in this case, as it was an online book, I couldn't turn it off. If you do not have time to read the rest of the book, I think that the chapters about WWII would prove an exceptional story by themselves.

The Dame of Sark showed tremendous courage by staying on Sark when the Germans invaded and occupied the Channel Islands in WWII. Though she told the Islanders they could have a way off before it was too late, many of them chose to stay on Sark. They could have no idea that they would be under this Occupation for 5 long years, and facing near starvation because of it.

When the Dame knew the Germans were coming, she and her husband set up some quick plans:

"I sent the Seneschal to the harbour to meet the
German officers and bring them to the Seigneurie, and then went
to the school to reassure the children and some of the women
who had read of German brutalities in Poland and were naturally
much more alarmed than the children; but by assuming an air
of cheerful confidence, which I was far from feeling, I steadied
them. It took me less than ten minutes after this to reach home
and have a consultation with Bob.

"'Let's take a leaf out of Mussolini's book,' I suggested. 'We'll
put two chairs behind the desk at the far end of the drawing
room. It is a long room and they'll have to walk the whole
length of it, which will give us a certain advantage,' adding,
'Besides, they'll have to walk up those few stairs from the hall
and then turn right before they are announced, and that will
also help us to look more impressive.'

"Bob agreed, and we hastily moved two chairs to the back of a
large writing table so that we could face the invaders. Next I
sent for my maid.

"'Now, when the German officers arrive, announce them as if
it was an ordinary occurrence to have German officers calling
on us.' She carried out my orders with great good sense.

"I was determined that this island, at least, should show a front
of firmness and dignity and give the impression that we were
taking everything in our stride in the firm conviction that we
would make the best of a bad time which we were convinced
would not endure long. I can only say that to my knowledge
no sign of defeatism was ever shown in Sark throughout the
Occupation."


The Dame maintained her dignity as rightful ruler, in spite of the Nazi rules and regulations, which she often disputed. Very quickly she established with the invaders that she was to be respected:

"I was treated with great courtesy by the senior officers and I,
in turn, extended to them the hospitality of the Seigneurie which
is due to all visitors in this island who are made known to me.
It is one of the pleasures and penalties of the Dame of Sark that
she never calls on strangers in her own island, but invites them
to her home. During the Occupation this feudal etiquette served
me well. For instance, in the course of polite conversation I was
often able to acquire useful information which would not other-
wise have been available and, in an affable manner without
argument or rudeness, indicate that we were not much im-
pressed by Hitler's regime or German boasts."

And later a visitor was
"...impressed by the way I dealt with the
Germans, and I often caught a look of amusement in his eyes
as he watched me remaining seated while the officers walked up
the drawing-room, bowed, kissed my hand and then bowed
again when I invited them to sit down. The stiff German
formality worked in my favour because it showed the Germans
that I expected to be treated in my home with the rigid etiquette
to which they were accustomed in their own country."



The people of Sark were imprisoned in their own land, and though they showed no violent resistance, they were determined that the Nazis know they were not to be beaten:


"The relationship between the Occupier and the Occupied was
of the utmost importance, and to me it was a great strain to keep
a balance. In the first place, we could do no good by sabotage.
There could be no underground movement where there was
absolutely no contact with the outside world - we were like
prisoners in a gaol with a garden to it. Our only weapon was
propaganda, and our only propaganda was a cheerful confidence
in victory for the Allies. We never disagreed with the Germans
openly, but we could annoy by asking ostensibly silly questions,
such as, 'Haven't you landed in England yet?' or 'I suppose
Russia has by now been conquered.' I found I could irritate
them by asking innocent questions about education in Germany,
and when told of Hitler's youth camps expressing great surprise
that children could be sent to these without the parents' wishes."


"I made a point of putting banned anti-Fascist books such as
Sawdust Caesar and The House that Hitler Built in a prominent
place on my sitting-room bookshelf where they were bound to
be seen. It was fun to watch the Germans eyeing them, but I was
never asked to move them, which was disappointing because I
had planned to say, 'Take them away by all means. Everybody
on the island has already read them in any case.' "

The Nazis took their food, searched their houses, cut off communication from the outside world except for the German-written propaganda newspapers, destroyed property, placed land mines and barbed wire around the island, required permits for everything, ruined the agriculture and fishing through their ignorant rules (not knowing how things worked on the island, their rules actually cut food productivity needlessly), and deported many to prison camps. Sometimes all it took was a criticism of the Nazis or Hitler to land someone on a boat to a prison camp. Mrs. Hathaway's own husband was taken to prison for over two years, for no reason.

"By now our quiet existence had changed. We had been warned
that the military authorities would turn over their administra-
tion to civil officials and that conditions would then deteriorate.
The warning was justified - conditions did deteriorate. Instead
of one sergeant and ten men, we were now bedevilled by swarms
of officials who arrived and demanded statistics of every con-
ceivable kind."

A hidden wireless enabled the islanders to get the “real” news, unfiltered through the Nazi media:

"Constant propaganda by the German troops and their news-
papers might well have undermined the morale of the islanders,
but on an island with only 400 inhabitants news spreads rapidly,
and a few words passed on quietly each morning worked
wonders. We could meet our neighbours shopping, wait till
the right moment occurred, then say, 'The B.B.C. announced
last night...' Those to whom information was passed on could
be trusted never to admit under any provocation that they had
heard it."


Mrs. Hathaway had tenacity, a quick mind, and fortitude, and so did the people of Sark. Through the war, they managed to keep up their morale in the face of hopeless times and a looming death by starvation. I think this story shows a great example to us, who, though not going through any awful experiences like these, often feel like we are "going under" when any small, everyday crisis threatens.
Keep up a good sense of humor, keep hope alive, and never give up!

"But in spite of privations, restrictions, the shortage of food
and all the nonsense of Occupation, the people of Sark absolutely
refused to show any signs of alarm or despondency. Sometimes
the Germans commented on this obvious self-confidence to me
and each time I would say smugly, 'There is no reason why we
should be depressed. We know that the Allies will win in the
end and even if the day of victory is a long way ahead there is
no doubt in our minds about the outcome.'"



Notes for Home schoolers: Though a lot of the book is, in my opinion, for adults (for instance, the accounts of war deaths), a judicious mother can choose some interesting bits to read to her children for a study of the Island's history, and a glimpse into another culture, and a first-hand account of a people living through WWII. It is a quick read, so read it first to see what would be appropriate for the grades you teach.

There is a chapter or two in the book that relates the failings of her father, his temper, and his character (both good points and bad). I could tell that she learned good things from him, and endured the painfully bad, and loved him in spite of it, and there is a reason she relates all this: later on in life she could see that her childhood prepared her for a lot of the hardships she had to endure, and her experiences were part of what helped her to survive these dark periods.

I think several chapters of this book would be great to use as a supplement or a break from the “everyday” history schoolwork!

More information:
http://www.sark.info/

Obituary for the Dame of Sark:

More pictures and also some discussion here:


Monday, December 1, 2008

My Mother is Betty Crocker

Black and White Woman with Flour Sifter




Buy at AllPosters.com

Finding Betty Crocker: The Secret Life of America's First Lady of Food Finding Betty Crocker: The Secret Life of America's First Lady of Food by Susan Marks


...or could have been! I just picked up this book at the Dollar store yesterday. I was surprised at Betty Crocker's secret life... though my favorite cookbook is the 1958 Betty Crocker one my Grandma gave me, Betty Crocker is in my mind regulated to a red spoon on a cake mix box (and I do not like cake mixes, as I was raised on a home-made dinette cake, which recipe I just now remembered came from a Betty Crocker cookbook!)  There are recipes and boxed foods with Betty Crocker's name on them, but "she" is no more to me than that. But in the old days, she was so real to Americans that they thought she was real. She was the second-best-known woman in America behind Eleanor Roosevelt. She received nearly 5,000 letters a day. I never knew she was a radio personality. And what she said on the radio surprised me even more. 

I could just imagine a time when homemakers prepared dinner in the kitchen, or folded their laundry, and listened to Betty Crocker (aka Marjorie Childs Husted and many actresses across the country who read Husted's scripts) dispense not only cooking advice and flour advertisements, but housekeeping advice, husband-keeping advice, and shared listener's letters from across America. As encouraging as it was to 1920's gals who could not cook to have an on-air cooking school, it would have been more encouraging to hear the motherly woman's voice cheering folk on during the depression, a world war, and lastly as a homemaker's champion in the early 1950's. 

The eerie thing was that the Betty Crocker of back then, so much more than a red spoon on a cake mix box, sounded just like my mother. I know it could not have been her, as she came on the scene too young to participate by the time Betty Crocker's radio career had ended. I told Mom that she could be the new Betty Crocker-- filling that empty part of the housekeeper's day that we did not know we were missing! 

Sunday, October 26, 2008

The Sensible Sense and Sensibility

By Miss DePoint, The Pleasant Times Movie Critic
Willoughby Begs a Lock of Marianne Dashwood's Hair
Willoughby Begs a Lock of Marianne Dashwood's Hair Giclee Print
Brock, C.e.
Buy at AllPosters.com
I am going to say something that will sicken those who think that they have had quite enough of Jane Austen.

For those of you who have seen all the adaptations there can be of this movie, I give you permission to skip my rantings and ravings. 

I have viewed yet another adaptation of Sense and Sensibility: The 1981 BBC miniseries (Yes, I know, it is old; some of you weren't even born then!). It is not as good quality filming, true; and the colors are rather faded and there is no dramatic music; but I thought it was worth a look.

Now I will say something that will astonish my friends: I think it is the best one yet!

The BEST Marianne I have seen yet is in this 1981 adaptation. Sense and Sensibility fans need to watch this Marriane for themselves, and see if they come to the same conclusion. The actress gives us all the impressions of youth, of a head that is full of misguided poetical romantic notions, of childish prejudice, and she is a better at crying than the 2007 Marriane. But most of all (shock coming--) she's modest. And that makes more sense to me... if I were her mother, I wouldn't let her go out as uncovered as the 1995 Marriane was. 

This adaptation also made it clear that Elinor liked to draw and paint, and really showed the level-head and good sense of her character, coupled with the doubts and trials of her situation and her inexperience of youth. In many scenes she was too pale, I think, looking much like a wax doll. I think the film needs to be updated with some color enhancement. I liked this Elinor a lot, even though she couldn't cry very convincingly.

Even though the Edward in this version has gone out of style- they all look much more "dashing" these days- he was the best Edward portrayal I have seen yet. The filmmakers took the time to establish more of a relationship between he and Elinor, as they did in the '07 series, yet  I think this actor did a much better job of making his character count in the film. One gets the feeling that there may be some substance to this character, in the short amount of time we see him; and he seems quiet and sober, which suits Elinor. 

The mother happens to be the best portrayal of the mother I have seen, too. She isn't so depressed as the other Mrs. Dashwoods have been. She has a way of seeming cheerful under the circumstances that she has been put in. She seemed to be portrayed here as having sense, even though we are told in the book that she was not unlike Marriane. 

There were some liberties taken with the film; some details were changed or left out, for instance, and Margeret's character has been left out entirely. But that didn't really matter to me... she didn't figure too prominently in the book, and all the modern films have done is use her to show that somehow girls in Jane Austen's day were oppressed and didn't have a hope of growing up to be a sea captain or soldier. Leaving her out was probably cheaper for the producers, but it didn't seem to hurt the story to have her gone. 

The "fall" scene where Willoughby rescues Marriane left out the rain storm, but we can forgive that for the introduction of a really well done Willoughby. MUCH better than Mr. Frog from the '07 version, and younger than the 1995 Willoughby, though Greg Wise is hard to top in that role.

Colonel Brandon at first did not seem interesting, but stay with him during the story, and you will find that he is very kind and gentle.  He was a gentleman through and through. You may like him by the end, though he does seem too old for Marianne.

The other characters in the book show up here, as in the 2007 version-- Sir John and his wife Lady Middleton, Mrs. Jennings, and the Dashwood and Ferrars family, as well as the Miss Steeles. I was not impressed too much with the Miss Steeles. I would have to watch it again to see if they improve with time. Some may find the other characters disappointing or lacking humor. If you aren't familiar with the book or watching the film carefully, you may be confused by the introduction of all these people. 

I liked John and Fanny Dashwood better in this version, their characters seemed closer to the book. I did not like Fanny's hysterical screaming, but when one has read some of Jane Austen's juvenile works, one could see how she would laugh at the ridiculous over-the-top fainting and screaming.  

There isn't as much scenery as in other films, and not a great variety of costumes, but I did like some of the details of the dresses. 

This series takes some quiet and calm time to view. Put up your feet in the evening and get a cup of tea. Beyond Fanny's screaming, there isn't a lot of really highly noisy or stressful drama, and it takes more concentration to watch this series as it moves slower than a modern movie. 

Favorite Scenes: When Elinor dumps Marriane off the see-saw, it was rather amusing. I also liked the scenes with Elinor and Edward. 
Least Favorite Scenes: Fanny Screaming!
Who would I like to invite to Tea? Mrs. Dashwood. 

Thursday, October 9, 2008

Movie Review: Arranged

By The Pleasant Times Movie Critic Miss dePoint

I have recently viewed the movie "Arranged" and have to say I liked it. The story is about a friendship that forms between an Orthodox Jew and a Muslim in New York. The two young women find that they both have their beliefs in their traditions, morality and modesty challenged by the world they are in. They also find that they have something else in common: they are both going to have an arranged marriage.

Having read a New York Times review of this movie, I thought I would write my own. Though some found it perhaps depressing that these young women stuck to their family values and traditions, I found it encouraging that there are still people who have loyalty to their family values and upbringing. And where some might mock the idea that in the end, "father knows best," I found that the fathers loved their daughters very much, and wanted them to have a happy marriage and home.

I was impressed that instead of tearing down the whole notion of arranged marriages, the filmmakers gave us a look at each culture from the perspective of those living it them. I might not agree with either culture, but I enjoyed learning about them and seeing how each family worked. The journey to a mate may have been rough at times for these ladies, but it had a happy ending. And one would not expect this kind of journey to be without doubt and fear.

The mothers and fathers were involved with these arrangements, and the daughters were not without a choice. I think the phrase "arranged marriage" conjures up images of medieval kings marrying off their royal children to someone the child had never even seen before, regardless of their feelings. That is not the case in this film.

The actresses did a great job being "natural" with the script. And the prospective bridegrooms were often hilarious!

This is a movie for adults, not appropriate for children. Older "marriageable" children might enjoy it! Certainly their parents will.

There are three scenes for which to watch out for: Early on in the movie, when the two young women are starting their job as teachers, there is a "getting to know you" scene where the principal of the school asks each person to tell them something "juicy." Just mute the part where the worldly girl tells what she did.
There is a party scene that some may want to fast forward. The Jewish girl goes to her cousin's house and then to a party. While it is worldly, I am sad to say that it is no worse than what you see on the street corner every day. The purpose was to show nervousness and tension (and yes, revulsion) that a person, who has been brought up with strong values and morals, feels when they are thrust into a worldly situation. Nevertheless, some may not be interested in seeing it.
And the last thing you may want to fast forward is a brief scene with some kind of fortune teller.

Now that I have told you that, you can enjoy the rest of the film! I think most will find it delightful and funny.

Wednesday, July 9, 2008

Play that little piece of Kalkbrenner's....


For those of you familiar with the movie "Wives and Daughters," you may remember the time that Molly was urged to "play that little piece of Kalkbrenner's..." by her stepmother. I thought the piano piece was very beautiful, and spent I don't know how many fruitless hours trying to find some kind of sheet music by Kalkbrenner, hoping to stumble across THE song.

Friedrich Kalkbrenner was a contemporary with Chopin and apparently wrote an abundance of music, which I could not find. However, I need not have fussed over it, for I had the music in my shelf long before I had ever heard of Molly or Kalkbrenner.

It is called "Nocturne" # 5 in b flat major by John Field, and probably a better music student than I would have known that. I have passed this piece of music up for at least fifteen years, thumbing around in a favorite music book for other pieces to play. For some reason or another, I never wanted to try it. Out of boredom with my other songs, I decided to sound this one out. I was so tickled and it is a beautiful and not too difficult piece to play. The link above is to a free PDF download. Enjoy!



screen shot from http://caps.desert-sky.net/w&d.htm

Wednesday, June 11, 2008

"Bella"

 I recently watched a film recommended to me, entitled "Bella," that I really enjoyed. It was a bit hard to understand at first, and it helped a lot to have someone who had already seen it explain that there was a flashback here or there. The movie starts with a man who has a flashback with more flashbacks in it.. and a flash forward. Once you understand that it is easier to connect the dots!

The main character was a fellow who was headed for great success and wealth in his career, but an accident changes that all and will haunt him the rest of his life. This story is about how he finds a way to heal his past and help others...specifically a woman named Nina who is realizing a huge change in her own life.

Despite the rather serious sounding theme, it was quite an enjoyable film, and there was much happiness in it. The positive portrayal of a Puerto Rican/Mexican family, with their love and warmth, was one of the best parts of the film.

Be sure to also watch the behind-the-scenes extra on the dvd.

Warning #1: This is not for little children. There is nothing "bad" in it, but there is a traumatic accident with a death and the film deals with the issue of abortion.
Warning #2: This movie may make you hungry. There was a lot of cooking going on!
83978: Bella, DVD Bella, DVD

Tuesday, May 20, 2008

Movie Review: Cranford

By the Pleasant Times Movie Critic, Miss dePoint


I am sure that many of your availed yourselves of the opportunity to watch the Cranford series on Public Television this month. As I am a fan of most costume dramas, I was prepared to enjoy this one immensely.

Cranford is about a little village in England, and the inhabitants thereof, their wants and wishes, secret hopes and desires, amidst the daily activities and events of the village. Lest you think this sounds boring, let me assure you it is quite the opposite. If I had been of a frail constitution I would not have survived this series. When I say "hopes and desires" I mean largely profound things, and when I saw "events of the village" I am speaking of absolute tragedies and shocking events and moments of triumph.

As I understand it, this production is a compilation of several books, none of which have crossed my path in my short life. However, as a book lover and one who dislikes seeing stories "refreshed" or "adapted" by filmmakers, I hope for fellow loyal book devotees that this film was accurate to their imagination, at least as accurate as a compilation could be.

I also understand that my former criticisms of these Masterpiece adaptations being too "choppy" had to do with editing it for the time slot on television. If "Cranford" had been edited, it did not appear to be choppy to me, just fast-paced. It was not too difficult to keep track of everyone, a little easier than a Dickens film I think.

The acting was fine; I think that this was a gathering of some of the best actors, many familiar to us from other period films we enjoy.

Though I did not entirely care for the older ladies' excesses of lace on caps and collars, I can say that I admired many of the finer points of the costumes, and I very much liked the dresses of the younger characters. They were modest, which is quite a rarity in movies.

However, the medical/bloody scenes were too difficult to watch. I had to get up and leave the room at one point. The tension in other parts was very strong. There is something rather cruel about the story, for just about the time I got used to, fond of, or hoping the best for, a character, Mrs. Gaskell would kill them off. It was unfair!

The ending was a happy one, but it was so lickity-split after all the agony that I had gone through, that I was tense for hours afterwards. I thought the film needed a longer "happy ending" segment to make up for all the death and loss.

With the fine acting, the humor, the tension and the "action" (yes, there was an explosion) I believe that the men will find this series interests them as much as it does the women. For myself, if I did watch this film again, it would be with a heavy fast-forward finger.

Monday, April 7, 2008

Movie Review: Sense and Sensibility (the new one)

By The Pleasant Times Movie Critic, Miss dePoint

Bracing myself to watch a new adaption of a favorite book (which in my mind had already been done quite well in movie form a few years ago), and sure that I would cringe through it all, I watched the newest Sense and Sensibility movie. I must say, I did not expect to enjoy it so much! I was quite pleased that this movie had more from the book. I would gladly watch it again, indeed, I want to!

Seaside Hideaway
Seaside Hideaway
Limited Edition

Kinkade, Thomas
Buy at AllPosters.com

And now for the the deficiencies of this movie. I do not have time to write of all that is wrong with it, but will settle on a few things. If only they had consulted me first!

Where shall I begin? At the beginning I think: If you have not seen it yet, fast forward the first 5 or ten minutes. It was completely unnecessary. We aren't supposed to know how much of a cad Willoughby is at the start anyway.

I really lament that the filmmakers threw away a golden opportunity to make something different out of this film. Throughout the whole thing I could see that they obviously thought that since the last movie was done so well (the Emma Thomson version) that they would just copy that one in a lot of the scenes. I thought that such a pity! Let me give you a few for-instances:

In the Emma Thompson movie, John and Fanny Dashwood spend their journey to Norland reducing the amount of help they will give to the girls. Ditto in this movie. In the book, this conversation may have happened after they were already there, and did not occur in a carriage, and therefore I would think it is open for the filmmakers' creativity. At least, don't imitate the last film so accurately!

Elinor's conversation with Edward, telling him of Col. Brandon's offer, looked like they were imitating the other film in style and setting.

Elinor running in a huge sob from the room when Edward is about to propose-- I wish they would leave that out. I know Jane Austen put something like it in the book but I haven't seen a convincing sob in these movies, though I have to say that the crying in other scenes seemed closer to normal than in the other S&S.

Then there are the added scenes, too numerous to mention, that were not in the book and didn't make sense to me: the rug-beating and the wood chopping stand out the most as being very odd for high-bred rich people to do. I could understand if Elinor was beating rugs at the cottage, though, but not at Norland. Doesn't it remind you of Cinderella? The evil step-sister, Fanny, turning the girls into servants...

I watched this movie with two companions, one who fell asleep and the other who only stayed a few minutes, finding more pressing duties to attend to. Not a good sign, I suppose!

Here again, as in the some of the newer films that I have recently reviewed, I have to comment on the heavy breathing. My movie-watching companion (the one who was bored to sleep) commented that she could not even hear herself or anyone around her breathing that loud. Is this a new thing-- to put microphones in the actors' mouths?

Some of the camera work I think was odd, but overall I appreciated the brightness in this film, when it seemed that most of it was under rainy looking skies, and it could have been terribly dark all the way through. Some of the lighting was very natural looking. My companion disliked the low quality look of the film, however.

There were some scenes that were so badly done I wonder how they made it into the film. One in particular made me laugh out loud-- when Marianne and Elinor are on the cliffs looking out over the sea, and Marianne is telling how she has changed-- their dresses are billowing in the wind so oddly, they look like lobsters!

Now for the characters: My friend pointed out that Elinor sounded just like Emma Thompson. True, but that was where the similarity ended for me. I liked this Elinor MUCH better. She perhaps has not attained to the high quality of acting as more practiced actresses (I could tell a lot of the characters were acting, as opposed to being fooled into thinking this was all real, which movies are supposed to do!) but I enjoyed all of her scenes and would like to see the film again on her account. I disliked her striped dresses though.

I did not like the mother. In the book, she was supposed to be charming, and a lot like Marriane. This woman was stiff, and said things in a near-monotone.

Margaret was destined to be a sweet and innocently charming character, if they had but left off her nasty rudeness at Norland and resisted turning her into a little feminist at the end of the film.

Marianne was one of those people that gave me that feeling, "where have I seen her before?" Not on screen, mind you, but I think I have met someone that looks like her, and spent some time in her company, maybe at a tea party? If you look like this Marriane and know me, make sure to remind who you are! This actress made a good Marianne, though I have a few complaints about what the filmmakers did with her: The color combinations of her country day dresses, her limited piano repertoire, and also she warmed up to Col. Brandon too quickly after her disappointment with Willoughby. It was obvious that she falls in love with whoever picks her up and carries her through the rain (which by the way Col. Brandon did not do in the book).

Ah, Willoughby. We shall always regret that they cast this particular fellow for this part. He should have been saved for another film, perhaps to play Napoleon Bonaparte.
He was too creepy from the get-go. How could she fall for him? He wasn't even handsome!

And I was disappointed in Edward. They tried to find a Hugh Grant-look-alike and though he had more lines, I have a feeling he was there because of his looks and not his acting. He didn't seem quite the right fit for this Elinor, in my mind. But of course, I am quite biased, as I didn't care for this character in the book too much, either!

I did like Col. Brandon, against my expectations. Anyone who has a family member who is an English Major has probably seen "Our Mutual Friend," in which this actor plays the horrid "schoolmaster Headstone." I was really glad I could see this actor in a completely different role. It must be awful to play a villain so well, that when people see your face, they involuntarily shudder. Now we can all see him play a nice guy, and I thought that he was an excellent Col. Brandon, much much better than Alan Rickman's Col. Brandon. This one only needed a haircut.

As for the other characters: I was glad to see they did not leave everyone out that was in the book. I enjoyed Lucy Steele's sister, who was a good support for Lucy's character. John and Fanny did look like the last John and Fanny (a great pity) but at least this time they had little Harry along! Sir John. Mrs. Jennings, Charlotte and Mr. Palmer could have all been improved upon. And so could Lady Middleton's hair style.

Cullercoats Cliffs" src="http://imagecache2.allposters.com/images/CHRPOD/VIC13039200701.jpg" width=350 border=0>




Cullercoats Cliffs

Giclee Print


Foster, Myles...


Buy at AllPosters.com

And now for
Favorite lines: None so far. I was hoping to see my favorite line in this film, when John and Fanny are reducing the amount of money he hoped to give to his sisters. He is thinking about giving his step-mother an annuity. Fanny says it is better than parting with all the money at once, but says that if Mrs. Dashwood "lives another fifteen years, we shall be completely taken in." John replies,
"Fifteen years! My dear Fanny; her life cannot be worth half that purchase."

Favorite Scenes: I like the one of Elinor buying the fish, in the last half hour or so. Very pretty, like an old-fashioned painting. I also liked the scenes in the girls' room, when I could hear the ocean so clearly. And the last scene, when we see that Elinor and Edward have set up housekeeping in a little cottage with some chickens!

Least Favorite Scenes: Anything with Willoughby in it; and the lobster-backed dresses scene mentioned above.

Wish they had included: The rivalry between Lady Middleton and Fanny regarding their sons.
The Miss Steeles trying bravely to get into Lady Middleton's good graces by appeasing her spoilt children.
Mrs. Jennings overhearing little bits of Col. Brandon's conversation with Elinor about giving Edward a living, and thinking that Col. Brandon is proposing to Elinor!
Mrs. Jennings nursing Marriane back to health. I thought it was a really neat trick to take someone so annoying and make the reader soften towards them, and see their good heart.


Who would I like to invite to Tea? Elinor!

Saturday, March 1, 2008

Movie Review: Emma

By the Pleasant Times Movie Critic, Miss dePoint




The next movie in the line-up of Jane Austen flicks is A&E's version of Emma, with Kate Beckinsale.


It is worth watching, though many of you who enjoyed the Mirimax version of Emma (with Gwenyth Paltrow) might have a hard time warming up to it.


Certainly the clothing is more modest in this version! And the costumes are excellent (minus a few strange hats). The acting is pretty good, but it isn't as obviously humorous as the other and the colors are not as bright. The film looks more "authentic" and historical than the Mirimax version, though, and the music includes English folk tunes.




There is more in the A&E Emma from the book, and I am glad that Mr. John Knightly and family have more of a presence (and some lines!) in this film. Frank Churchill and Jane Fairfax were excellent in this film, and I only wish that I could somehow get them into the Mirimax version.


Kate Beckinsale does a good job of playing the immature snob Emma, who thinks she knows what she is doing with other people's lives and is very conceited about it, but rather blind to her own faults and who succeeds only in making a fool of herself.


The disappointments are Mr. Elton, who cannot seem to get the frown off his face, and Mr. Knightly, who seems so harsh and angry and cranky that one is rather put off by him. And by the time you get used to him, it is the end of the film. There did not seem to be a spark between him and Emma. One may be surprised that they even wanted to marry each other. I think the Mirimax Emma did a better job of warming up the relationship.


Mrs. Elton does a good job at being annoying, but I was rather disappointed at her accent. It sounded like she was shifting accents, a bit of high-class British accent here, a word or two that sounded American-- I couldn't quite figure it out.


Which character would I invite to tea?


Miss Bates. I wouldn't have to think of anything to say that way! By the way, have you seen Prunella Scales playing Queen Victoria?




Favorite lines:


Mr. John Knightly in the carriage-"Aye, Mr. Weston must have a very good opinion of himself. Asking people to leave their own fireside in the depths of winter just for the sake of coming to see him. He must think himself a most agreeable fellow. And here we are, setting forward, to spend five dull hours in another man's house. Going in dismal weather to return probably in worse; four horses and four servants taken out for nothing but to convey five, idle, shivering creatures into colder rooms and worse company than they might have had at home."




Favorite scenes:


The visit to Donwell Abbey to pick strawberries. The gardens were beautiful and the strawberries looked delicious! Please don't tell me they were fake!

Tuesday, February 19, 2008

Movie Review: Pride and Prejudice

By The Pleasant Times Movie Critic, Miss dePoint

Mr. Darcy Finds Elizabeth Bennet Tolerable




Mr. Darcy Finds Elizabeth Bennet Tolerable
Giclee Print

Thomson, Hugh
Buy at AllPosters.com

I hope you all have been enjoying the beautiful and humorous A&E Pride and Prejudice series showing on Masterpiece Classics this month. In my opinion it is one of the best movies and all the actors do an excellent job. Whoever was in charge of casting got it just right.


I speak from prejudice, of course, for I have seen this film at least twenty times. There are a few films that I watch over and over and still cannot tell that people are acting in them! This series is one of them.


I really don't see how any newer versions can compare, or even why they bothered to make a newer version. As a matter of fact I refuse to watch the newer Pride and Prejudice. Why would I want to when the A&E one is just about perfect?


The scenery and locations are wonderful, and I quite envy Elizabeth her long country walks.

The music actually fits the scenes and characters, though I do not always care for the straining violins. However, it isn't nearly as annoying as some of the newer music scores have been in the Austen films.


'Mr.


Mr. Collins and Elizabeth, from "Pride and Prejudice" by Jane Austen circa 1894
Giclee Print

Thomson, Hugh
Buy at AllPosters.com


Mr. Darcy Enters a Room in Which Elizabeth Bennet is Seated at Her Writing Desk
Mr. Darcy Enters a Room in Which Elizabeth Bennet is Seated at Her Writing Desk Giclee Print
Thomson, Hugh
Buy at AllPosters.com



The costumes are too low for the women, and that is a great pity and ruinous to the enjoyment of the film. It reduces it from being a family film to a chick flick (even then it is not so nice). I think the filmmakers could have had a wonderful film without the immodesty, and that way the men could have a decent film to watch (though there are no explosions, murders or spaceships, I am sure that there is a gentleman in all men that could appreciate the fine acting and humor of the story).

However, there are some gowns that are decent and pretty amongst the costumes and one can get great ideas from them. Indeed, since this and other Jane Austen films first came out, the regency styles have been quite popular even amongst fashion designers.

Elizabeth Bennet Refuses Mr. Darcy


Elizabeth Bennet Refuses Mr. Darcy
Giclee Print

Thomson, Hugh
Buy at AllPosters.com
'
"I Have Not an Instant to Lose" Says Elizabeth Bennet to Mr. Darcy
Giclee Print

Thomson, Hugh
Buy at AllPosters.com
The length of the film is satisfying, for those who like to see as much of the story as they can get. Towards the end, the Lydia mess gets a bit tiresome, as if they are running out of steam by that time, but that could be only noticeable when you are watching it in its entirety.


I have recently found another, fuller review of this series (with pictures!) done by someone more knowledgeable than myself about the film, the names of the actors, directors, etc. I really don't pay much attention to the names, and I think interested readers might enjoy these reviews. Here is the link, and if you scroll down to the P&P part one you will find an interesting comparison of the characters throughout several different film versions (This link is provided with all the usual disclaimers given for sites that one hasn't really read thoroughly).



Here are a few of my favorites from the film:



Which character would I invite to tea? Col. Fitzwilliam! He is such a fine, happy fellow, and so cheerful. One of my favorite characters, even though he is only a small part of the book and film.


Favorite lines:


Mostly come from Mr. Bennet:
Trying to prevent the re-telling of the ball: "No lace, I beg of you!"
"Would that he had sprained his ankle in the first dance!"

After meeting Mr. Wickham: "How kind of him to entertain us so eloquently with his misfortunes"

After Jane's Disappointment: "You promised me that if I called on him that he would marry one of my daughters!"

And his laying-down-the-law to his girls after Lydia goes astray: He was going to forbid a soldier to "pass through the town;" was not going to let his girls out unless they could prove that they had spent "ten minutes in a useful manner", "Balls will be strictly prohibited, unless you stand up with one of your sisters!" and after ten years "if you are a good girl, I will take you to a review at the end of them."

Favorite scenes:

I enjoyed seeing the changes in Elizabeth and Darcy as the film progressed. She found out he actually had a heart, and he found out that she was capable of being nice back!

Least favorite scenes:

The Bennets at the Ball (any ball) were quite embarrassing, even for the unrelated viewer.

Elizabeth's haughty look at Darcy when she meets him in the woods at Rosings Park. It was really very cruel!


Wish they had included: The ending of the book more accurately: Mrs. Bennet trying to get rid of the odious Mr. Darcy (for Jane and Bingley's benefit) by sending him on long tramps over the hills with Elizabeth, not realizing that they were engaged and found this treatment quite nice! And the "happily ever after" section that tells how it all turned out- what Lady Catherine thought in the end, and whether or not Jane and Bingley spent all their money.